Much of the value of the book comes from his interviews with Asian entrepreneurs such as Deepak Amin of Covelix and Peter Valdes, Fil-Am co-founder of Tivoli Systems, a systems management software company that was eventually acquired by IBM.
Of particular interest to me is his discussion of the role of industrial policy in developing the Information and High Technology industries which he labels Techno-nationalism and defines as:
"a desire to free their economies from an over reliance on Western technologies, and to be recognized internationally for the ability to develop their own cutting-edge technologies. Most Asian economies drive innovation through national programs rather than market-driven research and development"This observation squares with what i have previously written about concerning industrial development. The role of the State has been a contentious issue (for example in the comments section here). Nevertheless, i believe that the author remains relatively agnostic about this matter and acknowledges the useful role that multinationals play in driving innovation.
More about matters concerning the book here.
6 comments:
hey chad, i've a question. how'd you manage to get your labels on the sidebar?
Hi Sparks, go to 'Page Elements', then click on 'Add a Page Element'. Choose 'Labels'.
arrgh. but i'd have to re-format everything to do it...ah well. i'll do it when i get sick of my layout. thanks!
Re: Valdes (was it?) acknowledges the useful role that multinationals play in driving innovation.
No quarrel with that cvj. Quarrel is with non-innovative markets where multinationals are prepared to pump in investments in the hope of a decent ROI.
Philippines is one country that likes to be called innovative but suffers from non-innovation malignancy.
Root cause: rampant, across the board, endless, sky is the limit corruption.
In 1992, my company, a multinational and one of the top 10 in the world in its domain, offered to invest more than 500m$ worth of technical knowhow, equipment, etc. in a project under FVR's self reliance program or the BOT scheme.
Everything was aboveboard. Company wanted to penetrate the market that after the US bases were vacated and thought RP was going to be a level playing field. We have shortliste potential local partners - Keppel, Baseco, and even EEI. All three were go, go. We finally signed an MOA with Keppel and the Naval dockyard.
We bought a software company for the occassion, recommended by one of FVR's people in Malacanang. Everything was going well but when we consistently refused to pay "commission" or facilitators' fee to some cabinet members, one of whom currently holds a seat in the SC, the whole thing stagnated. We had spent well over dozens of millions of dollars in due diligence reports, etc. and we thought we should cut our losses and sent our engineers home.
Can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Up to him.
Anna, i believe what you just described is a case of economic sabotage.
Post a Comment